This site states a lot of numbers: ₹6+ Cr in client savings, 30,000+ users, a ₹4 Cr run-rate, driver-side cancellations from 40% to 6%. A reader has no way to check most of them on the spot, which makes the rules behind them part of what I am offering. These are the rules.
Figures about my work come from one place
Every figure about my own work comes from one verified context file, checked against my CV, which feeds the site, the resume and the AI clone. Nothing states a number about my work that is not in it. When a figure changes, as the ZenCabs numbers did in October 2026, it changes everywhere at once, so the site cannot say one thing and the resume another. The file also keeps a list of retired figures that must never appear again.
Run-rates come with the months behind them
A run-rate is a fair measure of momentum and an easy one to inflate. So wherever I cite ZenCabs' ₹4 Cr annualised run-rate, I also show the monthly GMV of ₹33L+ and the 10,000+ rides behind it, and the arithmetic that links them: 10,000 rides at ₹331 is about ₹33L a month, and twelve of those is ₹4 Cr. I apply the same test to other people's numbers in marketplace metrics that flatter.
Industry numbers carry a source
Every article that uses an industry figure lists its sources at the end, and when I derive a number I show the working. Doing this changes what I write. The logistics piece started from the widely repeated claim that logistics costs India 13% to 14% of GDP; the government-commissioned study puts it at 7.97%, and the article follows the study. That is in India's logistics cost is 7.97% of GDP.
Unconfirmed details stay unconfirmed
When I cannot confirm something, the site says less. The press coverage of my work is listed by its source, with a descriptive title, until I have the exact published headline and date. A precise-looking detail that turns out to be wrong costs more trust than a plain one.
The clone is held to the same rule
The AI clone on this site may only state figures that are in its knowledge base, which is compiled from the same content files. It is told to say it does not know when a question goes beyond them, and to point people to me. The engineering behind that is in what building an AI clone of myself taught me.
What I would ask of any candidate
The same rules make a useful interview test. Ask a candidate where a number on their CV comes from, how it was measured and what it was measured against. Someone who ran the thing answers at once and usually adds the caveat themselves. It is the fastest check I know of whether a person did the work or stood near it.
